You need to find out the annual mean wind speed in your area. Check your countries wind association website for links to your local wind map. But beware it may not be completely accurate especially in more protected or less protected areas. However if you believe you live in a more windy spot in your area (for example your property is ocean front with no tree or you are on the very top of a mountain) you can feel more confident that a Master Flo Wind Turbine will produce more energy then expected.
Estimates of energy production at different annual mean wind speeds per sq meter of area will be posted here as they become available.
Please note that any estimate by any company or association are only very good guesses and the annual mean wind speed will vary from year to year, so the annual kWh per year will be different then stated.
Since wind speed is not constant, a wind turbines annual energy production is never as much as the sum of the generator nameplate ratings multiplied by the total hours in a year. The ratio of actual productivity in a year to this theoretical maximum is called the capacity factor. Typical capacity factors are 20–40%, with values at the upper end of the range in particularly favorable sites. For example, a 1 MW turbine with a capacity factor of 35% will not produce 8,760 MW·h in a year (1 × 24 × 365), but only 1 × 0.35 × 24 × 365 = 3,066 MW·h, averaging to 0.35 MW. The Vortex Wind Turbine capacity factor should be much higher then typical capacity factors.
There is a lot of conflicting information about the various renewable energy technologies. Wind power is generally considered more competitive with solar photovoltaic, geothermal and biomass, but is usually more expensive than hydro or solar heating. Generally speaking, wind power complements these other power sources by providing a least cost approach under certain conditions. In many situations, a hybrid system that combines wind, photovoltaic, and passive solar heating systems would provide the most consistent power at the least cost. However people in non equatorial regions (those above the 40th latitude North and South) will notice that solar power and solar heating fails to provide expectable power in the winter months. The shorten hours of operation and extra power requirements make wind even more attractive.
Yes, wind turbines can really help the environment. Wind turbines produce no air, water, or thermal pollution and emit no greenhouse or smog-causing gases unlike some other renewable energy systems. By using wind power you will also be offsetting pollution that would have been generated by your utility company. Over its life, a conventional small residential wind turbine can offset approximately 1.2 tons of air pollutants and 200 tons of greenhouse gas pollutants (carbon dioxide and other gases which cause global warming). Also more small wind turbines can reduce the need for new large scale power facilities to be built and new distributions systems to be developed which does consume resources, creates pollution, and effect animal habitats.
The only caveat to consider is will the wind turbine produce usable power. Far too many small wind turbines (systems rated below 1 kilowatt) produce very little power. For example, a typical 400 watt generator needs wind at the speed of 45 KPH or 27 MPH to produce 400 watts and it only produces 200 watts at 35 KPH or 21 MPH. So in most parts of the world a 400 watt three blade turbine only produces about half of a 100 watt light bulb on average. The environmental cost to manufacturer, ship and install most smaller wind turbines will probably never make environmental sense. The financial cost of very small turbines (less than 1 K) almost always does not make sense.
In a normal grid tied application, the power consumer (home or business) is served simultaneously by the three blade turbine and a local utility. If the wind speeds are below cut-in speed (5-12 mph) which regularly happens in many locations, the utility supplies all the power. Even when following manufacturers guide lines most conventional turbines operate 25% at best. So generally, three blade turbines need to be higher to make sure they can operate above the cut-in speed. The Vortex Wind Funnel cut in speed is just below 6 mph. This gives the vortex two very important advantages. The Vortex Wind Funnel can either be installed at a lower height to save installation costs or it can be installed at the same height and produce power more consistently. Of course, this also means that the Vortex should be producing more power more regularly, and its capacity factor should be higher. Other advantages of the Vortex include:
Three Reasons:
Whereas for almost all three blades wind turbines, the terminal velocity is past the destruction point. On the contrary conventional three blade wind turbines either require braking systems or guidance systems to turn away from the wind. In some cases they require both which can greatly increase the weight and cost.
Based on the test by NREL HS40 power curve is shown against the Master Flo Mini Vortex power curve. However that is not the whole picture. The Instantaneous Power curve shows what should happen at a certain wind speed hitting the wind generator at right direction with normal turbulence. The reality is the Instantaneous wind speed is only a fair gauge of power output at a certain speed in that area that the test was done.
A fairer gauge of power output is the annual power production. However, you can not just say we average 6 m/s (meter and second) wind in this area per year so the wind turbine will make the power output at 6 m/s multiplied by 24 hours and 365 days a year. For example if you did that for the HS40 at 4.5 m/s your total power per year -44 kW (kilowatts). The truth is when the average is 4.5 m/s the wind speed is rarely 4.5 m/s at any one time. It is often slightly higher or lower. We have created a graph that would give a somewhat better picture of the annual power output. As you can see the Mini Vortex can clearly beats the power production of standard three blade wind turbine at speeds below 7 m/s (15 MPH).

Presumably as it extracts more power per unit speed, at high speed it is subject to more stress & strain. How does it stand up to high wind speeds? Historically the issue with wind mills has been that they produce power only 10 to 30 percent of the time and then only in areas that would be considered high wind areas. Clearly that is not what we are trying to do. We are trying to produce usable energy 40 to 60 percent of the time. The area were we are testing the Vortex would be considered a low to very low wind area, which is near obstructions (typical urban environment). Right now, at limited high speed test 100Km per hour we have had no stress or strain issues.
As you may have noticed, the design of the Vortex is similar to a wind sock. The wind sock and vortex design have terminal velocity built into the design. When the wind gets to strong the turbine will become saturated and the excessive wind will spill over the edges. So far Vortex failure speed has yet to be determined and the destruction wind speed may be very high. However we estimate it be over 100 miles an hours 160 KM/H in normal applications.
Firstly wind mills and wind turbines are not a major killer of birds (no study exists at least). House cats, by contrast, are estimated to kill roughly one billion birds each year in the US alone. Statistically, a single house cat, a window pane, or an automobile is a much greater threat to birds than a wind mill.
Anecdotal evidence indicates that birds occasionally collide with conventional three blade turbines as they do with any other large fast moving object (cars, airplanes etc). However, such events are rare and are very unlikely to have any impact on bird populations.
With regards to the Vortex, it always appears to be solid and should therefore cause fewer hits since it would look like it a solid object to a bird.
Historically the issue with wind mills has been that they produce power only 30 to 40 percent of the time and then only in areas that would be considered high wind areas. Clearly that is not what we are trying to do. We are trying to produce usable energy 80 to 90 percent of the time. The area were we are testing the Vortex would be considered a low to very low wind area, which is near obstructions (typical urban environment). Right now, at limited high speed test 50Km per hour we have had no stress or strain issues.
As you may have noticed, the design of the Vortex is similar to a wind sock. The wind sock and vortex design have terminal velocity built into the design. When the wind gets to strong the turbine will become saturated and the excessive wind will spill over the edges. So far Vortex failure speed has yet to be determined and the destruction wind speed may be very high. However we estimate it be over 90 miles an hour in normal applications.
The conventional answer was no, since the energy available in the wind is a function of the cube of its speed, there is very little energy available to be harvested at wind speeds less than 4 meters per second (m/s) (9 mph). Also historically low speed wind turbines would not produce as much energy at rated wind speed (optimum wind speed).
However Master Flo has developed a new style of wind turbine (patent pending) that starts producing energy at lower wind speeds and produce the same amount energy at rated speed. So Master Flo Vortex has a more efficient design that uses the wind speed more efficiently. Therefore if you are considering the purchase of a wind turbine, the ability to start at lower wind speeds should be consideration factor in selecting a machine, but the most important factor is power it can produce over a year. If a turbine can start producing power at lower wind speeds and produce more power at all wind speeds it will generate more power per year.
If you are interested in being a dealer, please email edward@mflo.com.